Receptive Field Block Net for Accurate and Fast Object Detection

Songtao Liu, Di Huang, Yunhong Wang
11/21/2017
cs.CV

Official code: GOATmessi8/RFBNet (1,416 stars, MIT, PyTorch, last commit 2021-11-02).

Abstract

Current top-performing object detectors depend on deep CNN backbones, such as ResNet-101 and Inception, benefiting from their powerful feature representations but suffering from high computational costs. Conversely, some lightweight model based detectors fulfil real time processing, while their accuracies are often criticized. In this paper, we explore an alternative to build a fast and accurate detector by strengthening lightweight features using a hand-crafted mechanism. Inspired by the structure of Receptive Fields (RFs) in human visual systems, we propose a novel RF Block (RFB) module, which takes the relationship between the size and eccentricity of RFs into account, to enhance the feature discriminability and robustness. We further assemble RFB to the top of SSD, constructing the RFB Net detector. To evaluate its effectiveness, experiments are conducted on two major benchmarks and the results show that RFB Net is able to reach the performance of advanced very deep detectors while keeping the real-time speed. Code is available at https://github.com/ruinmessi/RFBNet.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

GOATmessi8/RFBNetOfficial100%
PyTorchMIT

Receptive Field Block Net for Accurate and Fast Object Detection, ECCV 2018

1,416348C, C++Nov 25, 20174 years agoMIT
detectionmobilenetpytorchrfbnet

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2017receptive,
  title  = {Receptive Field Block Net for Accurate and Fast Object Detection},
  author = {Songtao Liu and Di Huang and Yunhong Wang},
  year   = {2017},
  eprint = {1711.07767},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07767}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/1711.07767.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/1711.07767)

Discussion