Extrapolating Treatment Effects in Multi-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs

Matias D. Cattaneo, Luke Keele, Rocio Titiunik, Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare
8/13/2018
econ.EMstat.APstat.ME

Official code: rdpackages/rdmulti (5 stars, last commit 2026-08-14). 1 more implementation below.

Abstract

In non-experimental settings, the Regression Discontinuity (RD) design is one of the most credible identification strategies for program evaluation and causal inference. However, RD treatment effect estimands are necessarily local, making statistical methods for the extrapolation of these effects a key area for development. We introduce a new method for extrapolation of RD effects that relies on the presence of multiple cutoffs, and is therefore design-based. Our approach employs an easy-to-interpret identifying assumption that mimics the idea of "common trends" in difference-in-differences designs. We illustrate our methods with data on a subsidized loan program on post-education attendance in Colombia, and offer new evidence on program effects for students with test scores away from the cutoff that determined program eligibility.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(2)

rdpackages/rdmultiOfficial100%

Robust Local Polynomial Methods for RD designs with Multiple Cutoffs or Multiple Scores

510R, TeXAug 7, 20202 months agoNOASSERTION
causal-inferenceprogram-evaluationregression-discontinuity-designstreatment-effects
24R, StataAug 9, 20204 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cattaneo2018extrapolating,
  title  = {Extrapolating Treatment Effects in Multi-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs},
  author = {Matias D. Cattaneo and Luke Keele and Rocio Titiunik and Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare},
  year   = {2018},
  eprint = {1808.04416},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.04416}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/1808.04416.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/1808.04416)

Discussion