Neural Conversational QA: Learning to Reason v.s. Exploiting Patterns

Nikhil Verma, Abhishek Sharma, Dhiraj Madan, Danish Contractor, Harshit Kumar +1 more
9/9/2019
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Neural Conversational QA tasks like ShARC require systems to answer questions based on the contents of a given passage. On studying recent state-of-the-art models on the ShARCQA task, we found indications that the models learn spurious clues/patterns in the dataset. Furthermore, we show that a heuristic-based program designed to exploit these patterns can have performance comparable to that of the neural models. In this paper we share our findings about four types of patterns found in the ShARC corpus and describe how neural models exploit them. Motivated by the aforementioned findings, we create and share a modified dataset that has fewer spurious patterns, consequently allowing models to learn better.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{verma2019neural,
  title  = {Neural Conversational QA: Learning to Reason v.s. Exploiting Patterns},
  author = {Nikhil Verma and Abhishek Sharma and Dhiraj Madan and Danish Contractor and Harshit Kumar and Sachindra Joshi},
  year   = {2019},
  eprint = {1909.03759},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03759}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/1909.03759.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/1909.03759)

Discussion