Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning

Yinbo Chen, Zhuang Liu, Huijuan Xu, Trevor Darrell, Xiaolong Wang
3/9/2020
cs.CVcs.LG

Official code: yinboc/few-shot-meta-baseline (655 stars, MIT, PyTorch, last commit 2021-10-10).

Abstract

Meta-learning has been the most common framework for few-shot learning in recent years. It learns the model from collections of few-shot classification tasks, which is believed to have a key advantage of making the training objective consistent with the testing objective. However, some recent works report that by training for whole-classification, i.e. classification on the whole label-set, it can get comparable or even better embedding than many meta-learning algorithms. The edge between these two lines of works has yet been underexplored, and the effectiveness of meta-learning in few-shot learning remains unclear. In this paper, we explore a simple process: meta-learning over a whole-classification pre-trained model on its evaluation metric. We observe this simple method achieves competitive performance to state-of-the-art methods on standard benchmarks. Our further analysis shed some light on understanding the trade-offs between the meta-learning objective and the whole-classification objective in few-shot learning.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

PyTorchMIT

Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning, in ICCV 2021

655108PythonJan 12, 20205 years agoMIT
few-shot-learningmachine-learningpytorch

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2020metabaseline,
  title  = {Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning},
  author = {Yinbo Chen and Zhuang Liu and Huijuan Xu and Trevor Darrell and Xiaolong Wang},
  year   = {2020},
  eprint = {2003.04390},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04390}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2003.04390.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2003.04390)

Discussion