A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understanding

Laura Ruis, Jacob Andreas, Marco Baroni, Diane Bouchacourt, Brenden M. Lake
3/11/2020
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

Official code: LauraRuis/groundedSCAN (70 stars, MIT, last commit 2022-01-10). 1 more implementation below.

Abstract

Humans easily interpret expressions that describe unfamiliar situations composed from familiar parts ("greet the pink brontosaurus by the ferris wheel"). Modern neural networks, by contrast, struggle to interpret novel compositions. In this paper, we introduce a new benchmark, gSCAN, for evaluating compositional generalization in situated language understanding. Going beyond a related benchmark that focused on syntactic aspects of generalization, gSCAN defines a language grounded in the states of a grid world, facilitating novel evaluations of acquiring linguistically motivated rules. For example, agents must understand how adjectives such as 'small' are interpreted relative to the current world state or how adverbs such as 'cautiously' combine with new verbs. We test a strong multi-modal baseline model and a state-of-the-art compositional method finding that, in most cases, they fail dramatically when generalization requires systematic compositional rules.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(2)

MIT

Grounded SCAN data set.

7012PythonJan 2, 20204 years agoMIT

The multi-modal sequence to sequence baseline neural models used in the Grounded SCAN paper.

164Shell, PythonFeb 16, 20205 years ago

Cite this paper

@article{ruis2020benchmark,
  title  = {A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understanding},
  author = {Laura Ruis and Jacob Andreas and Marco Baroni and Diane Bouchacourt and Brenden M. Lake},
  year   = {2020},
  eprint = {2003.05161},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.05161}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2003.05161.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2003.05161)

Discussion