Relative Feature Importance

Gunnar König, Christoph Molnar, Bernd Bischl, Moritz Grosse-Wentrup
7/16/2020
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Interpretable Machine Learning (IML) methods are used to gain insight into the relevance of a feature of interest for the performance of a model. Commonly used IML methods differ in whether they consider features of interest in isolation, e.g., Permutation Feature Importance (PFI), or in relation to all remaining feature variables, e.g., Conditional Feature Importance (CFI). As such, the perturbation mechanisms inherent to PFI and CFI represent extreme reference points. We introduce Relative Feature Importance (RFI), a generalization of PFI and CFI that allows for a more nuanced feature importance computation beyond the PFI versus CFI dichotomy. With RFI, the importance of a feature relative to any other subset of features can be assessed, including variables that were not available at training time. We derive general interpretation rules for RFI based on a detailed theoretical analysis of the implications of relative feature relevance, and demonstrate the method's usefulness on simulated examples.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{knig2020relative,
  title  = {Relative Feature Importance},
  author = {Gunnar König and Christoph Molnar and Bernd Bischl and Moritz Grosse-Wentrup},
  year   = {2020},
  eprint = {2007.08283},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.08283}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2007.08283.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2007.08283)

Discussion