What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams

Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang +1 more
9/28/2020
cs.CLcs.AI

Official code: jind11/MedQA (406 stars, MIT, last commit 2022-12-01).

Abstract

Open domain question answering (OpenQA) tasks have been recently attracting more and more attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. In this work, we present the first free-form multiple-choice OpenQA dataset for solving medical problems, MedQA, collected from the professional medical board exams. It covers three languages: English, simplified Chinese, and traditional Chinese, and contains 12,723, 34,251, and 14,123 questions for the three languages, respectively. We implement both rule-based and popular neural methods by sequentially combining a document retriever and a machine comprehension model. Through experiments, we find that even the current best method can only achieve 36.7\%, 42.0\%, and 70.1\% of test accuracy on the English, traditional Chinese, and simplified Chinese questions, respectively. We expect MedQA to present great challenges to existing OpenQA systems and hope that it can serve as a platform to promote much stronger OpenQA models from the NLP community in the future.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

jind11/MedQAOfficial100%
MIT

Code and data for MedQA

40637PythonSep 28, 20203 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jin2020what,
  title  = {What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams},
  author = {Di Jin and Eileen Pan and Nassim Oufattole and Wei-Hung Weng and Hanyi Fang and Peter Szolovits},
  year   = {2020},
  eprint = {2009.13081},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13081}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2009.13081.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2009.13081)

Discussion