Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actions

Yao Liu, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Emma Brunskill
7/1/2022
cs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: StanfordAI4HI/poela (3 stars, last commit 2022-10-27).

Abstract

Offline policy optimization could have a large impact on many real-world decision-making problems, as online learning may be infeasible in many applications. Importance sampling and its variants are a commonly used type of estimator in offline policy evaluation, and such estimators typically do not require assumptions on the properties and representational capabilities of value function or decision process model function classes. In this paper, we identify an important overfitting phenomenon in optimizing the importance weighted return, in which it may be possible for the learned policy to essentially avoid making aligned decisions for part of the initial state space. We propose an algorithm to avoid this overfitting through a new per-state-neighborhood normalization constraint, and provide a theoretical justification of the proposed algorithm. We also show the limitations of previous attempts to this approach. We test our algorithm in a healthcare-inspired simulator, a logged dataset collected from real hospitals and continuous control tasks. These experiments show the proposed method yields less overfitting and better test performance compared to state-of-the-art batch reinforcement learning algorithms.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

StanfordAI4HI/poelaCommunity100%

POELA: Policy Optimization with ELigible Actions

30Shell, MATLABJun 15, 20223 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2022offline,
  title  = {Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actions},
  author = {Yao Liu and Yannis Flet-Berliac and Emma Brunskill},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.00632},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00632v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.00632.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.00632)

Discussion