"Even if ..." -- Diverse Semifactual Explanations of Reject

André Artelt, Barbara Hammer
7/5/2022
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Machine learning based decision making systems applied in safety critical areas require reliable high certainty predictions. For this purpose, the system can be extended by an reject option which allows the system to reject inputs where only a prediction with an unacceptably low certainty would be possible. While being able to reject uncertain samples is important, it is also of importance to be able to explain why a particular sample was rejected. With the ongoing rise of eXplainable AI (XAI), a lot of explanation methodologies for machine learning based systems have been developed -- explaining reject options, however, is still a novel field where only very little prior work exists. In this work, we propose to explain rejects by semifactual explanations, an instance of example-based explanation methods, which them self have not been widely considered in the XAI community yet. We propose a conceptual modeling of semifactual explanations for arbitrary reject options and empirically evaluate a specific implementation on a conformal prediction based reject option.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{artelt2022even,
  title  = {"Even if ..." -- Diverse Semifactual Explanations of Reject},
  author = {André Artelt and Barbara Hammer},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.01898},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.01898v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.01898.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.01898)

Discussion