Offline RL Policies Should be Trained to be Adaptive

Dibya Ghosh, Anurag Ajay, Pulkit Agrawal, Sergey Levine
7/5/2022
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Offline RL algorithms must account for the fact that the dataset they are provided may leave many facets of the environment unknown. The most common way to approach this challenge is to employ pessimistic or conservative methods, which avoid behaviors that are too dissimilar from those in the training dataset. However, relying exclusively on conservatism has drawbacks: performance is sensitive to the exact degree of conservatism, and conservative objectives can recover highly suboptimal policies. In this work, we propose that offline RL methods should instead be adaptive in the presence of uncertainty. We show that acting optimally in offline RL in a Bayesian sense involves solving an implicit POMDP. As a result, optimal policies for offline RL must be adaptive, depending not just on the current state but rather all the transitions seen so far during evaluation.We present a model-free algorithm for approximating this optimal adaptive policy, and demonstrate the efficacy of learning such adaptive policies in offline RL benchmarks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ghosh2022offline,
  title  = {Offline RL Policies Should be Trained to be Adaptive},
  author = {Dibya Ghosh and Anurag Ajay and Pulkit Agrawal and Sergey Levine},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.02200},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02200v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.02200.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.02200)

Discussion