Improving the Faithfulness of Abstractive Summarization via Entity Coverage Control

Haopeng Zhang, Semih Yavuz, Wojciech Kryscinski, Kazuma Hashimoto, Yingbo Zhou
7/5/2022
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Abstractive summarization systems leveraging pre-training language models have achieved superior results on benchmark datasets. However, such models have been shown to be more prone to hallucinate facts that are unfaithful to the input context. In this paper, we propose a method to remedy entity-level extrinsic hallucinations with Entity Coverage Control (ECC). We first compute entity coverage precision and prepend the corresponding control code for each training example, which implicitly guides the model to recognize faithfulness contents in the training phase. We further extend our method via intermediate fine-tuning on large but noisy data extracted from Wikipedia to unlock zero-shot summarization. We show that the proposed method leads to more faithful and salient abstractive summarization in supervised fine-tuning and zero-shot settings according to our experimental results on three benchmark datasets XSum, Pubmed, and SAMSum of very different domains and styles.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2022improving,
  title  = {Improving the Faithfulness of Abstractive Summarization via Entity Coverage Control},
  author = {Haopeng Zhang and Semih Yavuz and Wojciech Kryscinski and Kazuma Hashimoto and Yingbo Zhou},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.02263},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02263v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.02263.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.02263)

Discussion