PAC Prediction Sets for Meta-Learning

Sangdon Park, Edgar Dobriban, Insup Lee, Osbert Bastani
7/6/2022
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification is a key component of machine learning models targeted at safety-critical systems such as in healthcare or autonomous vehicles. We study this problem in the context of meta learning, where the goal is to quickly adapt a predictor to new tasks. In particular, we propose a novel algorithm to construct \emph{PAC prediction sets}, which capture uncertainty via sets of labels, that can be adapted to new tasks with only a few training examples. These prediction sets satisfy an extension of the typical PAC guarantee to the meta learning setting; in particular, the PAC guarantee holds with high probability over future tasks. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on four datasets across three application domains: mini-ImageNet and CIFAR10-C in the visual domain, FewRel in the language domain, and the CDC Heart Dataset in the medical domain. In particular, our prediction sets satisfy the PAC guarantee while having smaller size compared to other baselines that also satisfy this guarantee.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{park2022prediction,
  title  = {PAC Prediction Sets for Meta-Learning},
  author = {Sangdon Park and Edgar Dobriban and Insup Lee and Osbert Bastani},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.02440},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02440v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.02440.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.02440)

Discussion