D-CBRS: Accounting For Intra-Class Diversity in Continual Learning

Yasin Findik, Farhad Pourkamali-Anaraki
7/13/2022
cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Continual learning -- accumulating knowledge from a sequence of learning experiences -- is an important yet challenging problem. In this paradigm, the model's performance for previously encountered instances may substantially drop as additional data are seen. When dealing with class-imbalanced data, forgetting is further exacerbated. Prior work has proposed replay-based approaches which aim at reducing forgetting by intelligently storing instances for future replay. Although Class-Balancing Reservoir Sampling (CBRS) has been successful in dealing with imbalanced data, the intra-class diversity has not been accounted for, implicitly assuming that each instance of a class is equally informative. We present Diverse-CBRS (D-CBRS), an algorithm that allows us to consider within class diversity when storing instances in the memory. Our results show that D-CBRS outperforms state-of-the-art memory management continual learning algorithms on data sets with considerable intra-class diversity.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{findik2022dcbrs,
  title  = {D-CBRS: Accounting For Intra-Class Diversity in Continual Learning},
  author = {Yasin Findik and Farhad Pourkamali-Anaraki},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.05897},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05897v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.05897.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.05897)

Discussion