Consistent Polyhedral Surrogates for Top-k Classification and Variants

Jessie Finocchiaro, Rafael Frongillo, Emma Goodwill, Anish Thilagar
7/18/2022
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Top-$k$ classification is a generalization of multiclass classification used widely in information retrieval, image classification, and other extreme classification settings. Several hinge-like (piecewise-linear) surrogates have been proposed for the problem, yet all are either non-convex or inconsistent. For the proposed hinge-like surrogates that are convex (i.e., polyhedral), we apply the recent embedding framework of Finocchiaro et al. (2019; 2022) to determine the prediction problem for which the surrogate is consistent. These problems can all be interpreted as variants of top-$k$ classification, which may be better aligned with some applications. We leverage this analysis to derive constraints on the conditional label distributions under which these proposed surrogates become consistent for top-$k$. It has been further suggested that every convex hinge-like surrogate must be inconsistent for top-$k$. Yet, we use the same embedding framework to give the first consistent polyhedral surrogate for this problem.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{finocchiaro2022consistent,
  title  = {Consistent Polyhedral Surrogates for Top-k Classification and Variants},
  author = {Jessie Finocchiaro and Rafael Frongillo and Emma Goodwill and Anish Thilagar},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.08873},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08873v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.08873.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.08873)

Discussion