Contextual Similarity is More Valuable than Character Similarity: An Empirical Study for Chinese Spell Checking

Ding Zhang, Yinghui Li, Qingyu Zhou, Shirong Ma, Yangning Li +2 more
7/17/2022
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Chinese Spell Checking (CSC) task aims to detect and correct Chinese spelling errors. Recently, related researches focus on introducing character similarity from confusion set to enhance the CSC models, ignoring the context of characters that contain richer information. To make better use of contextual information, we propose a simple yet effective Curriculum Learning (CL) framework for the CSC task. With the help of our model-agnostic CL framework, existing CSC models will be trained from easy to difficult as humans learn Chinese characters and achieve further performance improvements. Extensive experiments and detailed analyses on widely used SIGHAN datasets show that our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods. More instructively, our study empirically suggests that contextual similarity is more valuable than character similarity for the CSC task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2022contextual,
  title  = {Contextual Similarity is More Valuable than Character Similarity: An Empirical Study for Chinese Spell Checking},
  author = {Ding Zhang and Yinghui Li and Qingyu Zhou and Shirong Ma and Yangning Li and Yunbo Cao and Hai-Tao Zheng},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.09217},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09217v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.09217.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.09217)

Discussion