Evaluating the Stability of Deep Image Quality Assessment With Respect to Image Scaling

Koki Tsubota, Hiroaki Akutsu, Kiyoharu Aizawa
7/20/2022
cs.CVeess.IV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Image quality assessment (IQA) is a fundamental metric for image processing tasks (e.g., compression). With full-reference IQAs, traditional IQAs, such as PSNR and SSIM, have been used. Recently, IQAs based on deep neural networks (deep IQAs), such as LPIPS and DISTS, have also been used. It is known that image scaling is inconsistent among deep IQAs, as some perform down-scaling as pre-processing, whereas others instead use the original image size. In this paper, we show that the image scale is an influential factor that affects deep IQA performance. We comprehensively evaluate four deep IQAs on the same five datasets, and the experimental results show that image scale significantly influences IQA performance. We found that the most appropriate image scale is often neither the default nor the original size, and the choice differs depending on the methods and datasets used. We visualized the stability and found that PieAPP is the most stable among the four deep IQAs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tsubota2022evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating the Stability of Deep Image Quality Assessment With Respect to Image Scaling},
  author = {Koki Tsubota and Hiroaki Akutsu and Kiyoharu Aizawa},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.09856},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09856v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.09856.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.09856)

Discussion