A Generalized & Robust Framework For Timestamp Supervision in Temporal Action Segmentation

Rahul Rahaman, Dipika Singhania, Alexandre Thiery, Angela Yao
7/20/2022
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In temporal action segmentation, Timestamp supervision requires only a handful of labelled frames per video sequence. For unlabelled frames, previous works rely on assigning hard labels, and performance rapidly collapses under subtle violations of the annotation assumptions. We propose a novel Expectation-Maximization (EM) based approach that leverages the label uncertainty of unlabelled frames and is robust enough to accommodate possible annotation errors. With accurate timestamp annotations, our proposed method produces SOTA results and even exceeds the fully-supervised setup in several metrics and datasets. When applied to timestamp annotations with missing action segments, our method presents stable performance. To further test our formulation's robustness, we introduce the new challenging annotation setup of Skip-tag supervision. This setup relaxes constraints and requires annotations of any fixed number of random frames in a video, making it more flexible than Timestamp supervision while remaining competitive.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rahaman2022generalized,
  title  = {A Generalized & Robust Framework For Timestamp Supervision in Temporal Action Segmentation},
  author = {Rahul Rahaman and Dipika Singhania and Alexandre Thiery and Angela Yao},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.10137},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10137v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.10137.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.10137)

Discussion