N-best Response-based Analysis of Contradiction-awareness in Neural Response Generation Models

Shiki Sato, Reina Akama, Hiroki Ouchi, Ryoko Tokuhisa, Jun Suzuki +1 more
8/4/2022
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Avoiding the generation of responses that contradict the preceding context is a significant challenge in dialogue response generation. One feasible method is post-processing, such as filtering out contradicting responses from a resulting n-best response list. In this scenario, the quality of the n-best list considerably affects the occurrence of contradictions because the final response is chosen from this n-best list. This study quantitatively analyzes the contextual contradiction-awareness of neural response generation models using the consistency of the n-best lists. Particularly, we used polar questions as stimulus inputs for concise and quantitative analyses. Our tests illustrate the contradiction-awareness of recent neural response generation models and methodologies, followed by a discussion of their properties and limitations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sato2022nbest,
  title  = {N-best Response-based Analysis of Contradiction-awareness in Neural Response Generation Models},
  author = {Shiki Sato and Reina Akama and Hiroki Ouchi and Ryoko Tokuhisa and Jun Suzuki and Kentaro Inui},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2208.02578},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02578v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2208.02578.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2208.02578)

Discussion