MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark

Niklas Muennighoff, Nouamane Tazi, Loïc Magne, Nils Reimers
10/13/2022
cs.CLcs.IRcs.LG

Official code: embeddings-benchmark/mteb (3,466 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2026-04-29).

Abstract

Text embeddings are commonly evaluated on a small set of datasets from a single task not covering their possible applications to other tasks. It is unclear whether state-of-the-art embeddings on semantic textual similarity (STS) can be equally well applied to other tasks like clustering or reranking. This makes progress in the field difficult to track, as various models are constantly being proposed without proper evaluation. To solve this problem, we introduce the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB). MTEB spans 8 embedding tasks covering a total of 58 datasets and 112 languages. Through the benchmarking of 33 models on MTEB, we establish the most comprehensive benchmark of text embeddings to date. We find that no particular text embedding method dominates across all tasks. This suggests that the field has yet to converge on a universal text embedding method and scale it up sufficiently to provide state-of-the-art results on all embedding tasks. MTEB comes with open-source code and a public leaderboard at https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Apache-2.0

MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark

3,466733Shell, PythonApr 5, 20225 months agoApache-2.0
benchmarkbitext-miningclusteringinformation-retrievallow-resource-nlp+12 more

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{muennighoff2022mteb,
  title  = {MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark},
  author = {Niklas Muennighoff and Nouamane Tazi and Loïc Magne and Nils Reimers},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2210.07316},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07316}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2210.07316.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2210.07316)

Discussion