Data Valuation Without Training of a Model

Nohyun Ki, Hoyong Choi, Hye Won Chung
1/3/2023
cs.LG

Official code: JJchy/CG_score (22 stars, last commit 2022-12-30).

Abstract

Many recent works on understanding deep learning try to quantify how much individual data instances influence the optimization and generalization of a model. Such attempts reveal characteristics and importance of individual instances, which may provide useful information in diagnosing and improving deep learning. However, most of the existing works on data valuation require actual training of a model, which often demands high-computational cost. In this paper, we provide a training-free data valuation score, called complexity-gap score, which is a data-centric score to quantify the influence of individual instances in generalization of two-layer overparameterized neural networks. The proposed score can quantify irregularity of the instances and measure how much each data instance contributes in the total movement of the network parameters during training. We theoretically analyze and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the complexity-gap score in finding `irregular or mislabeled' data instances, and also provide applications of the score in analyzing datasets and diagnosing training dynamics. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/JJchy/CG_score

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

JJchy/CG_scoreOfficial100%

Data Valuation without Training of a Model, submitted to ICLR'23

225PythonDec 30, 20223 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ki2023data,
  title  = {Data Valuation Without Training of a Model},
  author = {Nohyun Ki and Hoyong Choi and Hye Won Chung},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2301.00930},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00930v2},
  journal = {ICLR 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2301.00930.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2301.00930)

Discussion