Within-group fairness: A guidance for more sound between-group fairness

Sara Kim, Kyusang Yu, Yongdai Kim
1/20/2023
stat.MLcs.CYcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

As they have a vital effect on social decision-making, AI algorithms not only should be accurate and but also should not pose unfairness against certain sensitive groups (e.g., non-white, women). Various specially designed AI algorithms to ensure trained AI models to be fair between sensitive groups have been developed. In this paper, we raise a new issue that between-group fair AI models could treat individuals in a same sensitive group unfairly. We introduce a new concept of fairness so-called within-group fairness which requires that AI models should be fair for those in a same sensitive group as well as those in different sensitive groups. We materialize the concept of within-group fairness by proposing corresponding mathematical definitions and developing learning algorithms to control within-group fairness and between-group fairness simultaneously. Numerical studies show that the proposed learning algorithms improve within-group fairness without sacrificing accuracy as well as between-group fairness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kim2023withingroup,
  title  = {Within-group fairness: A guidance for more sound between-group fairness},
  author = {Sara Kim and Kyusang Yu and Yongdai Kim},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2301.08375},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08375v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2301.08375.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2301.08375)

Discussion