Limitations of Piecewise Linearity for Efficient Robustness Certification

Klas Leino
1/21/2023
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Certified defenses against small-norm adversarial examples have received growing attention in recent years; though certified accuracies of state-of-the-art methods remain far below their non-robust counterparts, despite the fact that benchmark datasets have been shown to be well-separated at far larger radii than the literature generally attempts to certify. In this work, we offer insights that identify potential factors in this performance gap. Specifically, our analysis reveals that piecewise linearity imposes fundamental limitations on the tightness of leading certification techniques. These limitations are felt in practical terms as a greater need for capacity in models hoped to be certified efficiently. Moreover, this is in addition to the capacity necessary to learn a robust boundary, studied in prior work. However, we argue that addressing the limitations of piecewise linearity through scaling up model capacity may give rise to potential difficulties -- particularly regarding robust generalization -- therefore, we conclude by suggesting that developing smooth activation functions may be the way forward for advancing the performance of certified neural networks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{leino2023limitations,
  title  = {Limitations of Piecewise Linearity for Efficient Robustness Certification},
  author = {Klas Leino},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2301.08842},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08842v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2301.08842.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2301.08842)

Discussion