Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning

James Queeney, M. Benosman
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Many real-world domains require safe decision making in uncertain environments. In this work, we introduce a deep reinforcement learning framework for approaching this important problem. We consider a distribution over transition models, and apply a risk-averse perspective towards model uncertainty through the use of coherent distortion risk measures. We provide robustness guarantees for this framework by showing it is equivalent to a specific class of distributionally robust safe reinforcement learning problems. Unlike existing approaches to robustness in deep reinforcement learning, however, our formulation does not involve minimax optimization. This leads to an efficient, model-free implementation of our approach that only requires standard data collection from a single training environment. In experiments on continuous control tasks with safety constraints, we demonstrate that our framework produces robust performance and safety at deployment time across a range of perturbed test environments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{queeney2026riskaverse,
  title  = {Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {James Queeney and M. Benosman},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2301.12593},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.12593},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2301.12593.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2301.12593)

Discussion