An Evaluation of Persian-English Machine Translation Datasets with Transformers

Amir Sartipi, Meghdad Dehghan, Afsaneh Fatemi
2/1/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Nowadays, many researchers are focusing their attention on the subject of machine translation (MT). However, Persian machine translation has remained unexplored despite a vast amount of research being conducted in languages with high resources, such as English. Moreover, while a substantial amount of research has been undertaken in statistical machine translation for some datasets in Persian, there is currently no standard baseline for transformer-based text2text models on each corpus. This study collected and analysed the most popular and valuable parallel corpora, which were used for Persian-English translation. Furthermore, we fine-tuned and evaluated two state-of-the-art attention-based seq2seq models on each dataset separately (48 results). We hope this paper will assist researchers in comparing their Persian to English and vice versa machine translation results to a standard baseline.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sartipi2023evaluation,
  title  = {An Evaluation of Persian-English Machine Translation Datasets with Transformers},
  author = {Amir Sartipi and Meghdad Dehghan and Afsaneh Fatemi},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.00321},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00321v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.00321.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.00321)

Discussion