Speed-Oblivious Online Scheduling: Knowing (Precise) Speeds is not Necessary

Alexander Lindermayr, Nicole Megow, Martin Rapp
2/2/2023
cs.DScs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

We consider online scheduling on unrelated (heterogeneous) machines in a speed-oblivious setting, where an algorithm is unaware of the exact job-dependent processing speeds. We show strong impossibility results for clairvoyant and non-clairvoyant algorithms and overcome them in models inspired by practical settings: (i) we provide competitive learning-augmented algorithms, assuming that (possibly erroneous) predictions on the speeds are given, and (ii) we provide competitive algorithms for the speed-ordered model, where a single global order of machines according to their unknown job-dependent speeds is known. We prove strong theoretical guarantees and evaluate our findings on a representative heterogeneous multi-core processor. These seem to be the first empirical results for scheduling algorithms with predictions that are evaluated in a non-synthetic hardware environment.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lindermayr2023speedoblivious,
  title  = {Speed-Oblivious Online Scheduling: Knowing (Precise) Speeds is not Necessary},
  author = {Alexander Lindermayr and Nicole Megow and Martin Rapp},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.00985},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00985v2},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.00985.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.00985)

Discussion