Knowledge Gradient for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Decoupled Evaluations

Jack M. Buckingham, Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez, Juergen Branke
2/2/2023
stat.MLcs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Multi-objective Bayesian optimization aims to find the Pareto front of trade-offs between a set of expensive objectives while collecting as few samples as possible. In some cases, it is possible to evaluate the objectives separately, and a different latency or evaluation cost can be associated with each objective. This decoupling of the objectives presents an opportunity to learn the Pareto front faster by avoiding unnecessary, expensive evaluations. We propose a scalarization based knowledge gradient acquisition function which accounts for the different evaluation costs of the objectives. We prove asymptotic consistency of the estimator of the optimum for an arbitrary, D-dimensional, real compact search space and show empirically that the algorithm performs comparably with the state of the art and significantly outperforms versions which always evaluate both objectives.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{buckingham2023knowledge,
  title  = {Knowledge Gradient for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Decoupled Evaluations},
  author = {Jack M. Buckingham and Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez and Juergen Branke},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.01310},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01310v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.01310.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.01310)

Discussion