Policy Evaluation in Decentralized POMDPs with Belief Sharing

Mert Kayaalp, Fatima Ghadieh, Ali H. Sayed
2/8/2023
cs.LGcs.MAeess.SP

No official code found. Best implementation: asl-epfl/DecPOMDP_Policy_Evaluation_w-Belief_Sharing (3 stars, CC-BY-4.0, last commit 2023-07-31).

Abstract

Most works on multi-agent reinforcement learning focus on scenarios where the state of the environment is fully observable. In this work, we consider a cooperative policy evaluation task in which agents are not assumed to observe the environment state directly. Instead, agents can only have access to noisy observations and to belief vectors. It is well-known that finding global posterior distributions under multi-agent settings is generally NP-hard. As a remedy, we propose a fully decentralized belief forming strategy that relies on individual updates and on localized interactions over a communication network. In addition to the exchange of the beliefs, agents exploit the communication network by exchanging value function parameter estimates as well. We analytically show that the proposed strategy allows information to diffuse over the network, which in turn allows the agents' parameters to have a bounded difference with a centralized baseline. A multi-sensor target tracking application is considered in the simulations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

CC-BY-4.0
32PythonJan 29, 20233 years agoCC-BY-4.0
belief-statedistributed-state-estimationmulti-agent-reinforcement-learningpartially-observable-markov-decision-processvalue-function-learning

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kayaalp2023policy,
  title  = {Policy Evaluation in Decentralized POMDPs with Belief Sharing},
  author = {Mert Kayaalp and Fatima Ghadieh and Ali H. Sayed},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.04151},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04151v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.04151.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.04151)

Discussion