When Can We Track Significant Preference Shifts in Dueling Bandits?

Joe Suk, Arpit Agarwal
2/13/2023
cs.LGstat.ML

No official code found. Best implementation: joesuk/nonstationary-duel (0 stars, last commit 2025-02-28).

Abstract

The $K$-armed dueling bandits problem, where the feedback is in the form of noisy pairwise preferences, has been widely studied due its applications in information retrieval, recommendation systems, etc. Motivated by concerns that user preferences/tastes can evolve over time, we consider the problem of dueling bandits with distribution shifts. Specifically, we study the recent notion of significant shifts (Suk and Kpotufe, 2022), and ask whether one can design an adaptive algorithm for the dueling problem with $O(\sqrt{K\tilde{L}T})$ dynamic regret, where $\tilde{L}$ is the (unknown) number of significant shifts in preferences. We show that the answer to this question depends on the properties of underlying preference distributions. Firstly, we give an impossibility result that rules out any algorithm with $O(\sqrt{K\tilde{L}T})$ dynamic regret under the well-studied Condorcet and SST classes of preference distributions. Secondly, we show that $\text{SST} \cap \text{STI}$ is the largest amongst popular classes of preference distributions where it is possible to design such an algorithm. Overall, our results provides an almost complete resolution of the above question for the hierarchy of distribution classes.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

00JuliaJan 16, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{suk2023when,
  title  = {When Can We Track Significant Preference Shifts in Dueling Bandits?},
  author = {Joe Suk and Arpit Agarwal},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.06595},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06595v2},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.06595.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.06595)

Discussion