Gaussian-smoothed Imbalance Data Improves Speech Emotion Recognition

Xuefeng Liang, Hexin Jiang, Wenxin Xu, Ying Zhou
2/17/2023
cs.SDcs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In speech emotion recognition tasks, models learn emotional representations from datasets. We find the data distribution in the IEMOCAP dataset is very imbalanced, which may harm models to learn a better representation. To address this issue, we propose a novel Pairwise-emotion Data Distribution Smoothing (PDDS) method. PDDS considers that the distribution of emotional data should be smooth in reality, then applies Gaussian smoothing to emotion-pairs for constructing a new training set with a smoother distribution. The required new data are complemented using the mixup augmentation. As PDDS is model and modality agnostic, it is evaluated with three SOTA models on the IEMOCAP dataset. The experimental results show that these models are improved by 0.2\% - 4.8\% and 1.5\% - 5.9\% in terms of WA and UA. In addition, an ablation study demonstrates that the key advantage of PDDS is the reasonable data distribution rather than a simple data augmentation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liang2023gaussiansmoothed,
  title  = {Gaussian-smoothed Imbalance Data Improves Speech Emotion Recognition},
  author = {Xuefeng Liang and Hexin Jiang and Wenxin Xu and Ying Zhou},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.08650},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08650v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.08650.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.08650)

Discussion