Best of Both Worlds Policy Optimization

Christoph Dann, Chen-Yu Wei, Julian Zimmert
2/18/2023
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Policy optimization methods are popular reinforcement learning algorithms in practice. Recent works have built theoretical foundation for them by proving $\sqrt{T}$ regret bounds even when the losses are adversarial. Such bounds are tight in the worst case but often overly pessimistic. In this work, we show that in tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs), by properly designing the regularizer, the exploration bonus and the learning rates, one can achieve a more favorable polylog$(T)$ regret when the losses are stochastic, without sacrificing the worst-case guarantee in the adversarial regime. To our knowledge, this is also the first time a gap-dependent polylog$(T)$ regret bound is shown for policy optimization. Specifically, we achieve this by leveraging a Tsallis entropy or a Shannon entropy regularizer in the policy update. Then we show that under known transitions, we can further obtain a first-order regret bound in the adversarial regime by leveraging the log-barrier regularizer.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dann2023best,
  title  = {Best of Both Worlds Policy Optimization},
  author = {Christoph Dann and Chen-Yu Wei and Julian Zimmert},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.09408},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09408v1},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.09408.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.09408)

Discussion