Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT

Qihuang Zhong, Liang Ding, Juhua Liu, Bo Du, Dacheng Tao
2/19/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: WHU-ZQH/ChatGPT-vs.-BERT (191 stars, last commit 2023-04-17).

Abstract

Recently, ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. Several prior studies have shown that ChatGPT attains remarkable generation ability compared with existing models. However, the quantitative analysis of ChatGPT's understanding ability has been given little attention. In this report, we explore the understanding ability of ChatGPT by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question-answering tasks. Additionally, by combining some advanced prompting strategies, we show that the understanding ability of ChatGPT can be further improved.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

🎁[ChatGPT4NLU] A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT

1917PythonFeb 18, 20233 years ago
bertchain-of-thoughtchatgptin-context-learningnatural-language-understanding

Cite this paper

@article{zhong2023chatgpt,
  title  = {Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT},
  author = {Qihuang Zhong and Liang Ding and Juhua Liu and Bo Du and Dacheng Tao},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.10198},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10198v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.10198.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.10198)

Discussion