Near Optimal Memory-Regret Tradeoff for Online Learning

Binghui Peng, Aviad Rubinstein
3/3/2023
cs.DScs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

In the experts problem, on each of $T$ days, an agent needs to follow the advice of one of $n$ ``experts''. After each day, the loss associated with each expert's advice is revealed. A fundamental result in learning theory says that the agent can achieve vanishing regret, i.e. their cumulative loss is within $o(T)$ of the cumulative loss of the best-in-hindsight expert. Can the agent perform well without sufficient space to remember all the experts? We extend a nascent line of research on this question in two directions: $\bullet$ We give a new algorithm against the oblivious adversary, improving over the memory-regret tradeoff obtained by [PZ23], and nearly matching the lower bound of [SWXZ22]. $\bullet$ We also consider an adaptive adversary who can observe past experts chosen by the agent. In this setting we give both a new algorithm and a novel lower bound, proving that roughly $\sqrt{n}$ memory is both necessary and sufficient for obtaining $o(T)$ regret.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{peng2023near,
  title  = {Near Optimal Memory-Regret Tradeoff for Online Learning},
  author = {Binghui Peng and Aviad Rubinstein},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.01673},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01673v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.01673.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.01673)

Discussion