Physics-Informed Deep Learning For Traffic State Estimation: A Survey and the Outlook

Xuan Di, Rongye Shi, Zhaobin Mo, Yongjie Fu
3/3/2023
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

For its robust predictive power (compared to pure physics-based models) and sample-efficient training (compared to pure deep learning models), physics-informed deep learning (PIDL), a paradigm hybridizing physics-based models and deep neural networks (DNN), has been booming in science and engineering fields. One key challenge of applying PIDL to various domains and problems lies in the design of a computational graph that integrates physics and DNNs. In other words, how physics are encoded into DNNs and how the physics and data components are represented. In this paper, we provide a variety of architecture designs of PIDL computational graphs and how these structures are customized to traffic state estimation (TSE), a central problem in transportation engineering. When observation data, problem type, and goal vary, we demonstrate potential architectures of PIDL computational graphs and compare these variants using the same real-world dataset.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{di2023physicsinformed,
  title  = {Physics-Informed Deep Learning For Traffic State Estimation: A Survey and the Outlook},
  author = {Xuan Di and Rongye Shi and Zhaobin Mo and Yongjie Fu},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.02063},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02063v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.02063.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.02063)

Discussion