Revisiting the relevance of traditional genres: a network analysis of fiction readers' preferences

Taom Sakal, Stephen Proulx
3/9/2023
cs.SIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate how well traditional fiction genres like Fantasy, Thriller, and Literature represent readers' preferences. Using user data from Goodreads we construct a book network where two books are strongly linked if the same people tend to read or enjoy them both. We then partition this network into communities of similar books and assign each a list of subjects from The Open Library to serve as a proxy for traditional genres. Our analysis reveals that the network communities correspond to existing combinations of traditional genres, but that the exact communities differ depending on whether we consider books that people read or books that people enjoy. In addition, we apply principal component analysis to the data and find that the variance in the book communities is best explained by two factors: the maturity/childishness and realism/fantastical nature of the books. We propose using this maturity-realism plane as a coarse classification tool for stories.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sakal2023revisiting,
  title  = {Revisiting the relevance of traditional genres: a network analysis of fiction readers' preferences},
  author = {Taom Sakal and Stephen Proulx},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.05080},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05080v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.05080.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.05080)

Discussion