Mastering Strategy Card Game (Hearthstone) with Improved Techniques

Changnan Xiao, Yongxin Zhang, Xuefeng Huang, Qinhan Huang, Jie Chen +1 more
3/9/2023
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Strategy card game is a well-known genre that is demanding on the intelligent game-play and can be an ideal test-bench for AI. Previous work combines an end-to-end policy function and an optimistic smooth fictitious play, which shows promising performances on the strategy card game Legend of Code and Magic. In this work, we apply such algorithms to Hearthstone, a famous commercial game that is more complicated in game rules and mechanisms. We further propose several improved techniques and consequently achieve significant progress. For a machine-vs-human test we invite a Hearthstone streamer whose best rank was top 10 of the official league in China region that is estimated to be of millions of players. Our models defeat the human player in all Best-of-5 tournaments of full games (including both deck building and battle), showing a strong capability of decision making.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{xiao2023mastering,
  title  = {Mastering Strategy Card Game (Hearthstone) with Improved Techniques},
  author = {Changnan Xiao and Yongxin Zhang and Xuefeng Huang and Qinhan Huang and Jie Chen and Peng Sun},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.05197},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05197v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.05197.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.05197)

Discussion