Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals

Clément Bonet, Benoît Malézieux, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Lucas Drumetz, Thomas Moreau +2 more
3/10/2023
cs.LGeess.SPstat.ML

No official code found. Best implementation: clbonet/SPDSW (8 stars, last commit 2023-11-22).

Abstract

When dealing with electro or magnetoencephalography records, many supervised prediction tasks are solved by working with covariance matrices to summarize the signals. Learning with these matrices requires using Riemanian geometry to account for their structure. In this paper, we propose a new method to deal with distributions of covariance matrices and demonstrate its computational efficiency on M/EEG multivariate time series. More specifically, we define a Sliced-Wasserstein distance between measures of symmetric positive definite matrices that comes with strong theoretical guarantees. Then, we take advantage of its properties and kernel methods to apply this distance to brain-age prediction from MEG data and compare it to state-of-the-art algorithms based on Riemannian geometry. Finally, we show that it is an efficient surrogate to the Wasserstein distance in domain adaptation for Brain Computer Interface applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

clbonet/SPDSWCommunity100%

Implementation of our ICML2023 paper "Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals"

83Python, Jupyter NotebookNov 11, 20222 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bonet2023slicedwasserstein,
  title  = {Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals},
  author = {Clément Bonet and Benoît Malézieux and Alain Rakotomamonjy and Lucas Drumetz and Thomas Moreau and Matthieu Kowalski and Nicolas Courty},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.05798},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05798v2},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.05798.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.05798)

Discussion