Automated Design of Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Survey

Qi Zhao, Qiqi Duan, Bai Yan, Shi Cheng, Yuhui Shi
3/12/2023
cs.NEcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Metaheuristics have gained great success in academia and practice because their search logic can be applied to any problem with available solution representation, solution quality evaluation, and certain notions of locality. Manually designing metaheuristic algorithms for solving a target problem is criticized for being laborious, error-prone, and requiring intensive specialized knowledge. This gives rise to increasing interest in automated design of metaheuristic algorithms. With computing power to fully explore potential design choices, the automated design could reach and even surpass human-level design and could make high-performance algorithms accessible to a much wider range of researchers and practitioners. This paper presents a broad picture of automated design of metaheuristic algorithms, by conducting a survey on the common grounds and representative techniques in terms of design space, design strategies, performance evaluation strategies, and target problems in this field.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhao2023automated,
  title  = {Automated Design of Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Survey},
  author = {Qi Zhao and Qiqi Duan and Bai Yan and Shi Cheng and Yuhui Shi},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.06532},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06532v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.06532.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.06532)

Discussion