Physics-driven machine learning models coupling PyTorch and Firedrake

Nacime Bouziani, David A. Ham
3/13/2023
cs.LGcs.MSmath.NA

No official code found. Best implementation: nbouziani/physics-driven-ml (18 stars, MIT, PyTorch, last commit 2024-01-31).

Abstract

Partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to describing and modelling complex physical systems that arise in many disciplines across science and engineering. However, in many realistic applications PDE modelling provides an incomplete description of the physics of interest. PDE-based machine learning techniques are designed to address this limitation. In this approach, the PDE is used as an inductive bias enabling the coupled model to rely on fundamental physical laws while requiring less training data. The deployment of high-performance simulations coupling PDEs and machine learning to complex problems necessitates the composition of capabilities provided by machine learning and PDE-based frameworks. We present a simple yet effective coupling between the machine learning framework PyTorch and the PDE system Firedrake that provides researchers, engineers and domain specialists with a high productive way of specifying coupled models while only requiring trivial changes to existing code.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

PyTorchMIT

Physics-driven machine learning using PyTorch and Firedrake

1812PythonFeb 1, 20232 years agoMIT
autogradautomatic-differentiationdeep-learningdifferentiable-programmingdolfin-adjoint+6 more

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bouziani2023physicsdriven,
  title  = {Physics-driven machine learning models coupling PyTorch and Firedrake},
  author = {Nacime Bouziani and David A. Ham},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.06871},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06871v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.06871.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.06871)

Discussion