Uncertainty quantification in neural network classifiers -- a local linear approach

Magnus Malmström, Isaac Skog, Daniel Axehill, Fredrik Gustafsson
3/10/2023
cs.LGeess.SP

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Classifiers based on neural networks (NN) often lack a measure of uncertainty in the predicted class. We propose a method to estimate the probability mass function (PMF) of the different classes, as well as the covariance of the estimated PMF. First, a local linear approach is used during the training phase to recursively compute the covariance of the parameters in the NN. Secondly, in the classification phase another local linear approach is used to propagate the covariance of the learned NN parameters to the uncertainty in the output of the last layer of the NN. This allows for an efficient Monte Carlo (MC) approach for: (i) estimating the PMF; (ii) calculating the covariance of the estimated PMF; and (iii) proper risk assessment and fusion of multiple classifiers. Two classical image classification tasks, i.e., MNIST, and CFAR10, are used to demonstrate the efficiency the proposed method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{malmstrm2023uncertainty,
  title  = {Uncertainty quantification in neural network classifiers -- a local linear approach},
  author = {Magnus Malmström and Isaac Skog and Daniel Axehill and Fredrik Gustafsson},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.07114},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07114v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.07114.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.07114)

Discussion