On the Existence of a Complexity in Fixed Budget Bandit Identification

Rémy Degenne
3/16/2023
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In fixed budget bandit identification, an algorithm sequentially observes samples from several distributions up to a given final time. It then answers a query about the set of distributions. A good algorithm will have a small probability of error. While that probability decreases exponentially with the final time, the best attainable rate is not known precisely for most identification tasks. We show that if a fixed budget task admits a complexity, defined as a lower bound on the probability of error which is attained by the same algorithm on all bandit problems, then that complexity is determined by the best non-adaptive sampling procedure for that problem. We show that there is no such complexity for several fixed budget identification tasks including Bernoulli best arm identification with two arms: there is no single algorithm that attains everywhere the best possible rate.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{degenne2023existence,
  title  = {On the Existence of a Complexity in Fixed Budget Bandit Identification},
  author = {Rémy Degenne},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.09468},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09468v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.09468.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.09468)

Discussion