Backdoor Defense via Adaptively Splitting Poisoned Dataset

Kuofeng Gao, Yang Bai, Jindong Gu, Yong Yang, Shutao Xia
2/14/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: KuofengGao/ASD (50 stars, last commit 2024-04-08).

Abstract

Backdoor defenses have been studied to alleviate the threat of deep neural networks (DNNs) being backdoor attacked and thus maliciously altered. Since DNNs usually adopt some external training data from an untrusted third party, a robust backdoor defense strategy during the training stage is of importance. We argue that the core of training-time defense is to select poisoned samples and to handle them properly. In this work, we summarize the training-time defenses from a unified framework as splitting the poisoned dataset into two data pools. Under our framework, we propose an adaptively splitting dataset-based defense (ASD). Concretely, we apply loss-guided split and meta-learning-inspired split to dynamically update two data pools. With the split clean data pool and polluted data pool, ASD successfully defends against backdoor attacks during training. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets and DNN models against six state-of-the-art backdoor attacks demonstrate the superiority of our ASD. Our code is available at https://github.com/KuofengGao/ASD.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

KuofengGao/ASDCommunity59%

[CVPR 2023] Backdoor Defense via Adaptively Splitting Poisoned Dataset

506PythonMar 8, 20232 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gao2026backdoor,
  title  = {Backdoor Defense via Adaptively Splitting Poisoned Dataset},
  author = {Kuofeng Gao and Yang Bai and Jindong Gu and Yong Yang and Shutao Xia},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2303.12993},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12993},
  journal = {CVPR 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.12993.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.12993)

Discussion