Rethinking matching-based few-shot action recognition

Juliette Bertrand, Yannis Kalantidis, Giorgos Tolias
3/28/2023
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Few-shot action recognition, i.e. recognizing new action classes given only a few examples, benefits from incorporating temporal information. Prior work either encodes such information in the representation itself and learns classifiers at test time, or obtains frame-level features and performs pairwise temporal matching. We first evaluate a number of matching-based approaches using features from spatio-temporal backbones, a comparison missing from the literature, and show that the gap in performance between simple baselines and more complicated methods is significantly reduced. Inspired by this, we propose Chamfer++, a non-temporal matching function that achieves state-of-the-art results in few-shot action recognition. We show that, when starting from temporal features, our parameter-free and interpretable approach can outperform all other matching-based and classifier methods for one-shot action recognition on three common datasets without using temporal information in the matching stage. Project page: https://jbertrand89.github.io/matching-based-fsar

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bertrand2023rethinking,
  title  = {Rethinking matching-based few-shot action recognition},
  author = {Juliette Bertrand and Yannis Kalantidis and Giorgos Tolias},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.16084},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16084v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.16084.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.16084)

Discussion