Comparing Adversarial and Supervised Learning for Organs at Risk Segmentation in CT images

Leonardo Crespi, Mattia Portanti, Daniele Loiacono
3/31/2023
eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Organ at Risk (OAR) segmentation from CT scans is a key component of the radiotherapy treatment workflow. In recent years, deep learning techniques have shown remarkable potential in automating this process. In this paper, we investigate the performance of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) compared to supervised learning approaches for segmenting OARs from CT images. We propose three GAN-based models with identical generator architectures but different discriminator networks. These models are compared with well-established CNN models, such as SE-ResUnet and DeepLabV3, using the StructSeg dataset, which consists of 50 annotated CT scans containing contours of six OARs. Our work aims to provide insight into the advantages and disadvantages of adversarial training in the context of OAR segmentation. The results are very promising and show that the proposed GAN-based approaches are similar or superior to their CNN-based counterparts, particularly when segmenting more challenging target organs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{crespi2023comparing,
  title  = {Comparing Adversarial and Supervised Learning for Organs at Risk Segmentation in CT images},
  author = {Leonardo Crespi and Mattia Portanti and Daniele Loiacono},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.17941},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17941v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.17941.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.17941)

Discussion