Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization in (Non)-Euclidean Space Revisited

Jinyan Su, Changhong Zhao, Di Wang
3/31/2023
cs.LGcs.CRmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the problem of Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization (DP-SCO) in Euclidean and general $\ell_p^d$ spaces. Specifically, we focus on three settings that are still far from well understood: (1) DP-SCO over a constrained and bounded (convex) set in Euclidean space; (2) unconstrained DP-SCO in $\ell_p^d$ space; (3) DP-SCO with heavy-tailed data over a constrained and bounded set in $\ell_p^d$ space. For problem (1), for both convex and strongly convex loss functions, we propose methods whose outputs could achieve (expected) excess population risks that are only dependent on the Gaussian width of the constraint set rather than the dimension of the space. Moreover, we also show the bound for strongly convex functions is optimal up to a logarithmic factor. For problems (2) and (3), we propose several novel algorithms and provide the first theoretical results for both cases when $1<p<2$ and $2\leq p\leq \infty$.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{su2023differentially,
  title  = {Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization in (Non)-Euclidean Space Revisited},
  author = {Jinyan Su and Changhong Zhao and Di Wang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.18047},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18047v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.18047.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.18047)

Discussion