To be Robust and to be Fair: Aligning Fairness with Robustness

Junyi Chai, Xiaoqian Wang
3/31/2023
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Adversarial training has been shown to be reliable in improving robustness against adversarial samples. However, the problem of adversarial training in terms of fairness has not yet been properly studied, and the relationship between fairness and accuracy attack still remains unclear. Can we simultaneously improve robustness w.r.t. both fairness and accuracy? To tackle this topic, in this paper, we study the problem of adversarial training and adversarial attack w.r.t. both metrics. We propose a unified structure for fairness attack which brings together common notions in group fairness, and we theoretically prove the equivalence of fairness attack against different notions. Moreover, we show the alignment of fairness and accuracy attack, and theoretically demonstrate that robustness w.r.t. one metric benefits from robustness w.r.t. the other metric. Our study suggests a novel way to unify adversarial training and attack w.r.t. fairness and accuracy, and experimental results show that our proposed method achieves better performance in terms of robustness w.r.t. both metrics.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chai2023robust,
  title  = {To be Robust and to be Fair: Aligning Fairness with Robustness},
  author = {Junyi Chai and Xiaoqian Wang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.00061},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00061v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.00061.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.00061)

Discussion