Characterizing the contribution of dependent features in XAI methods

Ahmed Salih, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh, Steffen E. Petersen, Gloria Menegaz +1 more
4/4/2023
stat.MLcs.LGstat.AP

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) provides tools to help understanding how the machine learning models work and reach a specific outcome. It helps to increase the interpretability of models and makes the models more trustworthy and transparent. In this context, many XAI methods were proposed being SHAP and LIME the most popular. However, the proposed methods assume that used predictors in the machine learning models are independent which in general is not necessarily true. Such assumption casts shadows on the robustness of the XAI outcomes such as the list of informative predictors. Here, we propose a simple, yet useful proxy that modifies the outcome of any XAI feature ranking method allowing to account for the dependency among the predictors. The proposed approach has the advantage of being model-agnostic as well as simple to calculate the impact of each predictor in the model in presence of collinearity.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{salih2023characterizing,
  title  = {Characterizing the contribution of dependent features in XAI methods},
  author = {Ahmed Salih and Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo and Zahra Raisi-Estabragh and Steffen E. Petersen and Gloria Menegaz and Petia Radeva},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.01717},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01717v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.01717.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.01717)

Discussion