Correcting Flaws in Common Disentanglement Metrics

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing interest in learning disentangled representations, in which distinct features, such as size or shape, are represented by distinct neurons. Quantifying the extent to which a given representation is disentangled is not straightforward; multiple metrics have been proposed. In this paper, we identify two failings of existing metrics, which mean they can assign a high score to a model which is still entangled, and we propose two new metrics, which redress these problems. We then consider the task of compositional generalization. Unlike prior works, we treat this as a classification problem, which allows us to use it to measure the disentanglement ability of the encoder, without depending on the decoder. We show that performance on this task is (a) generally quite poor, (b) correlated with most disentanglement metrics, and (c) most strongly correlated with our newly proposed metrics.