Generative Knowledge Selection for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues

Weiwei Sun, Pengjie Ren, Zhaochun Ren
4/10/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: sunnweiwei/GenKS (6 stars, last commit 2023-09-19).

Abstract

Knowledge selection is the key in knowledge-grounded dialogues (KGD), which aims to select an appropriate knowledge snippet to be used in the utterance based on dialogue history. Previous studies mainly employ the classification approach to classify each candidate snippet as "relevant" or "irrelevant" independently. However, such approaches neglect the interactions between snippets, leading to difficulties in inferring the meaning of snippets. Moreover, they lack modeling of the discourse structure of dialogue-knowledge interactions. We propose a simple yet effective generative approach for knowledge selection, called GenKS. GenKS learns to select snippets by generating their identifiers with a sequence-to-sequence model. GenKS therefore captures intra-knowledge interaction inherently through attention mechanisms. Meanwhile, we devise a hyperlink mechanism to model the dialogue-knowledge interactions explicitly. We conduct experiments on three benchmark datasets, and verify GenKS achieves the best results on both knowledge selection and response generation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

sunnweiwei/GenKSCommunity100%

Code for "Generative Knowledge Selection for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues"

61PythonApr 12, 20233 years ago
dialogue-systemsinformation-retrieval

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sun2023generative,
  title  = {Generative Knowledge Selection for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues},
  author = {Weiwei Sun and Pengjie Ren and Zhaochun Ren},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.04836},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04836v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.04836.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.04836)

Discussion