Understanding Causality with Large Language Models: Feasibility and Opportunities

Cheng Zhang, Stefan Bauer, Paul Bennett, Jiangfeng Gao, Wenbo Gong +6 more
4/11/2023
cs.LGcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

We assess the ability of large language models (LLMs) to answer causal questions by analyzing their strengths and weaknesses against three types of causal question. We believe that current LLMs can answer causal questions with existing causal knowledge as combined domain experts. However, they are not yet able to provide satisfactory answers for discovering new knowledge or for high-stakes decision-making tasks with high precision. We discuss possible future directions and opportunities, such as enabling explicit and implicit causal modules as well as deep causal-aware LLMs. These will not only enable LLMs to answer many different types of causal questions for greater impact but also enable LLMs to be more trustworthy and efficient in general.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2023understanding,
  title  = {Understanding Causality with Large Language Models: Feasibility and Opportunities},
  author = {Cheng Zhang and Stefan Bauer and Paul Bennett and Jiangfeng Gao and Wenbo Gong and Agrin Hilmkil and Joel Jennings and Chao Ma and Tom Minka and Nick Pawlowski and James Vaughan},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.05524},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05524v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.05524.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.05524)

Discussion