How Useful are Educational Questions Generated by Large Language Models?

Sabina Elkins, Ekaterina Kochmar, Jackie C. K. Cheung, Iulian Serban
4/13/2023
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 7 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Controllable text generation (CTG) by large language models has a huge potential to transform education for teachers and students alike. Specifically, high quality and diverse question generation can dramatically reduce the load on teachers and improve the quality of their educational content. Recent work in this domain has made progress with generation, but fails to show that real teachers judge the generated questions as sufficiently useful for the classroom setting; or if instead the questions have errors and/or pedagogically unhelpful content. We conduct a human evaluation with teachers to assess the quality and usefulness of outputs from combining CTG and question taxonomies (Bloom's and a difficulty taxonomy). The results demonstrate that the questions generated are high quality and sufficiently useful, showing their promise for widespread use in the classroom setting.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 7 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{elkins2023useful,
  title  = {How Useful are Educational Questions Generated by Large Language Models?},
  author = {Sabina Elkins and Ekaterina Kochmar and Jackie C. K. Cheung and Iulian Serban},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.06638},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06638v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.06638.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.06638)

Discussion